Stablecoins: Riskless Investment or Financial Fraud?

Jan 10, 2024
Sarah Imran
5 min
Educational, Educational
Stablecoins case study


Stablecoins have been regarded as an ingenious form of payment due to their steadiness. They provide much-desired stability among the normally volatile cryptocurrency space. Even the most established giants like Bitcoin continue to be erratic, with wildly fluctuating prices resulting in both fortunes and losses equating to thousands of dollars. Stablecoins provide the members of the blockchain community with a unique promise- the chance to capitalize on the advantages of crypto (transparency, security, privacy, etc.) without being perpetually worried about the next price drop.

On the surface, stablecoins sound like a dream come true for crypto investors. As they provide them with the best of both the crypto and financial worlds. However, digging a little deeper raises several questions about the backing of these stablecoins. Do these companies really have the billions of dollars that would be required for them to remain stable? How authentic are their claims of where this money is stored? And, at the end of the day, can stablecoins even be trusted as a riskless investment? 

Before we unpack the answers to these heavy questions, let us first try to understand the technical concept behind stablecoins. We will also see what makes them so popular.

How Do Stablecoins Work?

A stablecoin can be understood as a type of cryptocurrency that is collateralized by the value of an underlying asset. This asset is one which is generally regarded around the world as being non-volatile, such as the US dollar, the Euro, or even precious metals like gold. This means that for every token that exists of a certain stablecoin, a single unit of stable currency must also be present with its provider. In theory, the tokens should be able to be converted back into the original currency at any time, also at a one-for-one exchange rate.

The security of having your crypto asset always be worth something is what attracts many people towards using stablecoins. Users know that despite factors like inflation, fluctuating exchange rates, or an increase in supply/demand, the value of most of the currencies backing stablecoins is subject to very little change on a day-to-day basis. By combining this stability with the decentralization offered by blockchain technology, the concept of a stablecoin was born.

The hype around using stablecoins can be linked to their ease of use. Big names like Tether, Binance, and Gemini remain wildly popular as trusted stablecoin providers within the blockchain community.  Each company claims that the billion or so coins they have in circulation are pegged onto stable currency by a 1-to-1 relationship. Users can buy and use these coins in the same way you would any other, with the price remaining equal or very close to a stable asset.

The Billion Dollar Backing Mystery

Despite being such a commonality in the crypto space, however, there seems to be little conversation around the most integral part of how these stablecoins function. That is their backing. Recently, an article released by Bloomberg attempted to bring this important point to light. They dug around into the financial statements of Tether, one of the most popular stablecoins on the market. Tether has also been credited as the first stablecoin ever. With its token USDT being pegged to the US Dollar since its inception. 

As of now, nearly 73 billion USDT are in circulation, with the majority of them being issued this year. This would mean that the company should, in theory, hold a corresponding $73B in real money to back the coins. An amount that would make it one of the 50 largest banks in the U.S., if it were a U.S. bank and not an unregulated offshore company. 

The sheer size of this amount coupled with the lack of transparency around just where these billions are hidden has brought forth the prying eyes of many regulators as well. Recently, an investigation on whether executives behind Tether committed bank fraud was opened by the US government. Before that, the company paid $18.5M to settle with a New York attorney-general who accused them of lying about their claim of 1-to-1 backing to cover up massive losses. The opposing party claimed that for periods of time, the company had no access to bank accounts anywhere in the world. This would undermine their declaration of holding one dollar for every one USDT. In the end, the case was settled with neither party admitting wrongdoing, though Tether did begin publishing a transparency report on their website which attempted to break down the way their reserves are stored.

Riskless Investment or Financial Fraud?

Stablecoins were originally created to provide stability to investors in the cryptocurrency space. When market volatility increases, traditional investors often turn to cash, treasury bonds, or money market funds. Similarly, crypto investors use stablecoins to keep their assets in low-risk areas. This strategy has contributed to the stablecoin market’s significant growth, expanding by 500% in the past year. Tether’s success is also attributed to its high liquidity, as it is used in about 70% of cryptocurrency trades against USDT. Investors trust that as long as the dollar remains stable, their USDT will retain value, making it a worthwhile investment.

What if the reserves backing a stablecoin are hidden, insufficient, or non-existent? Allegations against stablecoin executives suggest a risky picture. Some claim they risked reserves for potential millions in profits. John Betts, a bank manager in Puerto Rico used by Tether, emphasized this. He said, “It’s not a stablecoin, it’s a high-risk offshore hedge fund.” Even their banking partners are in the dark about their holdings or their existence.

The Bottom Line

Stablecoins have been quite successful in addressing some issues with traditional cryptocurrencies. However, their centralized nature raises suspicions. It’s unclear what happens to the billions of dollars in reserves these companies hold. Despite this, the public seems indifferent. Many might think the consequences of such allegations are worse than the current state. If Tether faced sanctions, it could disrupt global crypto trading, harming everyone. The key to safety is researching before investing to protect yourself and your assets.





related reports

subscribe to our newsletter !

State of security

Zunami Hack Analysis
Read More
Bonq DAOhack analysis
Read More