LightLink, an Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain, conducted a Liquidity Bootstrapping Pool (LBP) sale. This fundraising event was hosted on the Fjord Foundry platform and aimed to raise significant funds while ensuring fair price discovery and broad token distribution. In this read, we will examine the strategic parameters set by BlockApex that contributed to the successful LBP, which raised $5.28 million from 3,581 participants.
LightLink is designed to facilitate instant, gasless transactions tailored for decentralized applications (dApps) and enterprises. It targets enterprises that require predictable gas fees and high throughput transactions, offering a seamless user experience through direct interactions with web3 wallets.
To get an idea of how big LightLink is, have a look at the mainnet statistics as of the time of writing:
The landscape of token launch models in the cryptocurrency domain is diverse, reflecting the adage that there is no “one size fits all” solution. As the popularity of cryptocurrencies continues to surge, a variety of token launch mechanisms have emerged, each tailored to the unique needs and goals of different projects.
Despite this diversity, these models – Fixed Price Sales, AMM Markets, Dutch Auctions, and LBPs – share three core objectives: establishing deep liquidity, ensuring fair and broad token distribution, and facilitating efficient price discovery. Each model serves different objectives and suits different project needs. For LightLink, the LBP model was chosen due to its ability to ensure fair market price discovery and broad token distribution.
Feature | Fixed Price | AMM | Dutch Auction | Lockdrop + LBA | LBP |
Price Discovery | Predetermined | Market-driven | Descending price | Market-driven with lockdrop | Market-driven with weight ratios |
Liquidity | Dependent on market makers | High initial liquidity | Can be variable | High initial liquidity | High initial liquidity |
Distribution | Based on the investment amount | Based on liquidity provision | Based on bid price | Reward-based with LBA | Based on price and timing |
Risks | Price manipulation, low liquidity | Impermanent loss | Price volatility, bot attacks | Complex mechanism, All LP associated Risks | Complex mechanism, the potential for manipulation |
The LBP model was selected for several key advantages over other token sale mechanisms:
The success of the LBP sale hinged on several carefully set strategic parameters:
A combination of weights and balances determines prices in a liquidity bootstrapping pool. As the LBP progresses, the weights are algorithmically adjusted to decrease over time, inherently influencing the price to follow a downward trajectory. This price reduction is contingent upon the balance of the project token not diminishing at a faster rate than that of the decreasing weights. The relationship between these variables can be understood by the effective price formula:
Where
This formula is used to capture the price movement at each step of the sale given the changing balances and weights.
The relationship within the Liquidity Bootstrapping Pool becomes apparent when we observe the dynamics of the project token’s weights, specifically Wo (the initial weight of the project token). As Wo decreases over time, it leads to a reduction in the exponent value within the LBP’s price determination formula. Consequently, this diminishes the expression in the numerator, resulting in a decrease in the token’s price.
However, in scenarios where there is substantial buy pressure—indicating a rapid reduction in the project token’s balance and an increase in the reserve token’s balance at a rate that offsets the weight reduction—we can witness an increase in price rather than the anticipated reduction. This underscores the dynamic nature of LBPs, where price fluctuations are influenced by the interplay between supply and demand forces.
The project token balance Bo at each step or after each trade can be calculated through the following equation:
Where Bo(new) is the balance after the trade and Bo(old) is the balance of project tokens before the trade, ‘t’ is the number of project tokens purchased i.e. the sale amount.
Similarly, we can find the reserve token balance Bi at each step or after each trade using the following formula:
Where ‘t’ is the number of project tokens purchased and ‘P’ is the effective price of purchase.
Since the LBP sale follows a fixed schedule of decreasing weights, the weights flip over time, giving the participants to find their own price points to purchase the tokens.
The sale was marked by a well-distributed participation and smooth price discovery process:
BlockApex provided several strategic recommendations based on the analysis of the LBP sale, which was conducted via simulations and modeling participants’ behavior.
This approach enabled the prediction of an average price range of $0.15-$0.20 from simulations, whereas the actual price settled slightly lower at ~$0.12.
Strategic parameter setting in LBPs isn’t just about creating a fair and orderly sale; it’s about actively shaping the market dynamics around a new token in ways that align with the project’s long-term goals. By thoughtfully choosing initial prices, weight configurations, token supply proportions, and sale durations, projects can not only adapt to existing market conditions but also influence investor behavior to optimize the sale’s success.
The collaboration between BlockApex and LightLink in conducting the LBP sale on Fjord Foundry highlights the importance of strategic parameter setting in achieving successful fundraising and fair market practices.
Does your project have a similar need? Partner with BlockApex to leverage our expertise in strategic parameter setting and innovative fundraising models. Contact us today to learn how we can help you design and execute a successful token sale, ensuring fair price discovery, broad token distribution, and robust community engagement.
ADOT Finance integrates a blockchain-based marketplace and bridging system that facilitates the exchange and creation…
Bedrock is a multi-asset liquidity re-hypothecation protocol that allows the collateralization of assets like wBTC,…
What is Berachain? Berachain is a high performance, EVM-identical Layer 1 blockchain leveraging Proof of…
On September 3, 2024, Onyx DAO, a protocol derived from Compound Finance, suffered a severe…
The cryptocurrency world continues to expand rapidly, offering new investment opportunities almost daily. One of…
In today's digital age, where data is the new currency, safeguarding sensitive information has become…
This website uses cookies.